Is helping Ukraine worth risking WW3?
Last Updated: 01.07.2025 05:48
Letting Ukraine strike targets in Crimea is WW3.
Ukraine’s getting invitation to NATO is WW3?
Ukraine kicking Russia out of Ukraine is WW3?
US measles total nears 1,100 cases as Colorado reports airline cluster - CIDRAP
Trump approving to kill Soleimani is WW3.
Thank you.
Letting Ukraine strike Russia with their home-made weapons is WW3.
What is something you'd rate 10/10?
Just in the last 5 years:
Sending MANPADS/ATGMs to Ukraine is undoubtedly WW3.
Any day of the week — including Sundays.
Sending HIMARS is surely WW3.
Sending F16s to Ukraine is WW3.
Please kindly ask Mr Putin to avoid the WW3.
What’s next?
Sending Abrams tanks is absolutely WW3.
Ukraine’s incursion into Russia is undeniably WW3.
Apple Now Selling Refurbished M4 MacBook Air Models - MacRumors
Ukraine getting Javelins is WW3.
Letting Ukraine fire ATACMS at Russian air bases is patently conclusively unequivocally WW3.
Sending Stormshadow/Scalp missiles is WW3.
Can you write a poem or short story based on the first image that shows up on Pinterest?
Sending weapons to Ukraine is certainly WW3.
All they have to do is to withdraw their troops.
Let’s just make it real clear:
Sending ATACMS is WW3.
“It’s going to be WW3!” is the most notorious notion used by fear-mongers for years.
Ukrainians are so tired of hearing all this nonsense.
Supplying Ukraine with Tomahawks is WW3? Stationing western troops in Odesa is WW3?
Ukraine refusing to surrender to Russia in February 2022 is WW3.
Russia can stop this any time.